October 2003

Lead Articles

Tax Issues

Business Matters

Law Lines

 » In Brief

 » Filling the contribution gaps  » Bullying
 

Filling the contribution gaps

To receive the full basic state pension, currently paid at £77.45 a week, a man needs to have paid national insurance contributions (NICs) for 44 years, and a woman needs to have paid NICs for 39 years.

The retirement age for women born after 5 April 1950 will be extended to 65 by 2020, so they may have to work for longer to receive their full state pension.

If you have taken time out of work for study or you have worked overseas, your eventual basic state pension may be reduced. You can make up a contributions gap of up to six missing years by paying voluntary class 3 NICs, but is it worth it? The voluntary NICs will only provide entitlement to the basic state pension and not to the state second pension (S2P), or its predecessor, SERPS.

A wife can receive up to 60% of the basic state pension based on her husband's NICs, but this pension will generally only be paid when the husband reaches 65.

Since 1978, individuals who care for children or the disabled instead of earning a wage, can claim "home responsibilities protection". This reduces the number of contribution years required to qualify for the basic state pension. Before April 2002 it did not provide entitlement to S2P/SERPS.

As you can see, the state pension provision is not straightforward. You can get an idea of what you will receive by completing the form BR19 from the Pensions Service (part of the Department for Work and Pensions).

Once you have this forecast, we can help you decide on the most efficient way to fill any gaps in your pension provision.

Go to Top

 

Bullying

Mental cruelty is prevalent in some workplaces. In August 2003 a trader who was constructively dismissed by a firm of city brokers won nearly £1m damages because of bullying at work. His former employer had tried to argue that bad language and mis-treatment was the normal culture of many City trading environments. The court did not agree. The employee also won £250,000 towards his legal costs.

Go to Top

 

 Lead Articles

Tax Issues

Business Matters

Law Lines

 » In Brief

This newsletter has been prepared for general interest and it is important to obtain professional advice on specific issues. We believe the information contained in it to be correct at the time of publication. While all possible care is taken in the preparation of this newsletter, no responsibility for loss occasioned by any person acting or refraining from acting as a result of the material contained herein can be accepted by the firm, the authors or the publishers.